On June 9 the U.S. Supreme Court presented a victory to the aftermarket in the case of Quanta Computer Inc. v. LG Electronics. The decision overturned a previous ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, citing the "patent exhaustion" doctrine, which removes the patent holder’s ability to exert patent rights over the customers of its licensees.
In light of the ruling, Static Control Components has filed a motion to reconsider the trial judge's ruling on Prebate. In its, filing SCC “respectfully requests that the Court reconsider its interlocutory order [R. 10081] and deny Lexmark’s Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law regarding inducement of infringement.”
LG Electronics had licensed some of its patents related to memory management to Intel. However the license did not extend to third party “downstream users” that combined Intel's licensed products with third-party components. Quanta was one of those downstream users. It purchased licensed parts from Intel and used them in conjunction with non-Intel parts. LG sued Quanta and asserted that the combination of the Intel products with non-Intel memory and buses infringed LG's patents. Quanta argued that those patents were exhausted as to the Intel products Quanta was using.
In the ruling the Supreme Court stated “The authorized sale of an article that substantially embodies a patent exhausts the patent holder’s rights and prevents the patent holder from invoking patent law to control post-sale use of the article.”
...Full articles are available online six months after their original print date to online subscribers. This article is available in its entirety only in print to RECHARGER Magazine subscribers. Subscribe today to start your print subscription.
This article will be available online on 01/01/2009
